W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-ql@w3.org > January to March 2006

Re: Recursive replacement

From: David Carlisle <davidc@nag.co.uk>
Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2006 17:07:49 GMT
Message-Id: <200601301707.RAA23751@penguin.nag.co.uk>
To: martin@x-hive.com
CC: novak@ispras.ru, www-ql@w3.org


> But that doesn't matter for replacing it, at least not at the moment.

Yes I suddenly realised that that was the interpretation that you had.
I asked that explict question in a new thread a minute ago (perhaps I
should have kept it in this thread)

I asked  

  If you delete (or in the example posted earlier, replace) a node, are its children still around?

and you are saying the answer is yes. (which is fine by me, so long as I
know:-)

David

________________________________________________________________________
This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star. The
service is powered by MessageLabs. For more information on a proactive
anti-virus service working around the clock, around the globe, visit:
http://www.star.net.uk
________________________________________________________________________
Received on Monday, 30 January 2006 17:08:18 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Saturday, 22 July 2006 00:10:21 GMT