- From: Michael Rys <mrys@microsoft.com>
- Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2006 06:12:55 -0800
- To: "TAN Kuan Hui" <kuanhui@xemantics.com>, "Jonathan Robie" <jonathan.robie@datadirect.com>, <www-ql@w3.org>
This has been factored in, in that we have the notion of a snapshot at the top-level statement which needs to guarantee certain consistency constraints. Note that we expect the update language to be used in many different transaction environments and thus do not define a single transactional semantics. This means you could use the statements in a fully serializable transaction, or in an optimistic CC environment. Best regards Michael > -----Original Message----- > From: www-ql-request@w3.org [mailto:www-ql-request@w3.org] On > Behalf Of TAN Kuan Hui > Sent: Monday, January 30, 2006 5:07 AM > To: Jonathan Robie; www-ql@w3.org > Subject: XQuery Update Facility - Transaction Expressions > > > I note that transaction semantics (wrt ACID) are not mentioned > anywhere in the draft. Is this to be expected in subsequent > drafts or that it has already been factored in ? > > Kuan Hui > > > >
Received on Monday, 30 January 2006 14:12:55 UTC