Michael Kay wrote: >>But, it does not provide the exact solution I was >>looking for. > > > You actually gave two statements of your problem that were inconsistent with > each other, so I guessed; it seems I guessed wrong. (Missing out the > attribute was just ignoring an irrelevant detail). yes, sorry. I realize it now that the general rule I gave in my first mail is not consistent with the example. And your proposal matches the general rule. Thanks, Sergio > > Michael Kay > http://www.saxonica.com/ >Received on Monday, 21 March 2005 12:29:20 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Saturday, 22 July 2006 00:10:20 GMT