W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-ql@w3.org > April to June 2005

Re: Variable references in path expressions

From: Henry Luo <henryluo@vibrasoft.net>
Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2005 12:41:37 +0800
Message-ID: <008301c54c75$bc247e40$6502a8c0@Handy>
To: <www-ql@w3.org>

I've submitted as http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=1278

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Michael Kay" <mhk@mhk.me.uk>
To: "'Henry Luo'" <henryluo@vibrasoft.net>; "'Xavier Franc'"
<xfranc@online.fr>; <www-ql@w3.org>
Sent: Thursday, April 28, 2005 6:07 PM
Subject: RE: Variable references in path expressions


> > Personally I would strongly suggest either no atomic values
> > to returned in
> > path expression or atomic values to returned in any step of the path.
> > The middle way is not a good choice.
>
> As I've mentioned before, if you want the WG to address this comment then
> you need to raise it as a last call comment on the spec: see the status
> section of the spec for instructions on how to do this.
>
> Michael Kay
>
>
>
Received on Friday, 29 April 2005 04:42:40 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:17:17 UTC