W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-ql@w3.org > October to December 2003

RE: ugly-printed use cases output

From: Howard Katz <howardk@fatdog.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2003 17:35:01 -0700
To: "Jonathan Robie" <jonathan.robie@datadirect.com>, <www-ql@w3.org>
Message-ID: <IKEOLCDFPBBPPAHGNKKOGEJHCNAA.howardk@fatdog.com>

Nobody else thinks a normative version of this might be a good thing to
have? I stand forelornly alone?
Howard

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jonathan Robie [mailto:jonathan.robie@datadirect.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, October 22, 2003 3:08 PM
> To: Howard Katz; www-ql@w3.org
> Subject: Re: ugly-printed use cases output
>
>
> At 05:16 PM 10/22/2003, Howard Katz wrote:
>
> >Is there a full version of the Use Cases output available somewhere that
> >isn't pretty-printed? I'd find it useful for checking compliance against
> >whitespace-handling requirements. Pretty printing is nice to look at but
> >makes it harder to see if I'm doing whitespace properly. Does
> such a beast
> >exist?
>
> Nope! Sorry....
>
> Jonathan
>
Received on Wednesday, 22 October 2003 20:34:46 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:17:16 UTC