W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-ql@w3.org > January to March 2003

RE: XQuery books

From: Massimo Marchiori <massimo@w3.org>
Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2003 19:48:00 +0100
To: <Svgdeveloper@aol.com>
Cc: <www-ql@w3.org>, <xquery@yahoogroups.com>
Message-ID: <NGBBJNKIMLOPPCFHEJEMOEBFDCAA.massimo@w3.org>

Mmm, Andrew, the wording referred both to the Sams' one, and to the early adopter one.
Looking at it now, it is misleading in the sense that, yes, the early adopter is not brand new, I just wanted to convey the novelty
of the addition... (whoa... guess the word "new" just comes automatically on my fingertips as soon as a piece of news is to be
added.. ;)
Anyway, so, you are right: being an inconsistent use of "new", I've now deleted it.
Thanks for the careful reading.

Cheers,
-M

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Svgdeveloper@aol.com [mailto:Svgdeveloper@aol.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, March 19, 2003 7:37 PM
> To: massimo@w3.org
> Cc: www-ql@w3.org; xquery@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: XQuery books
>
>
> Hi Massimo,
>
> The XQuery page,
> http://www.w3.org/XML/Query
> states under the News heading that new XQuery books (plural) have been added.
>
> Only one such book appears to be on the Web page - Sams XQuery Kick Start.
>
> Is there a missing listing or is the news item inappropriately optimistic
> about the listing of XQuery books (plural)?
>
> Thanks
>
> Andrew Watt
> P.S. I didn't include XQuery Early Adopter above since it was first listed
> some time ago.
>
Received on Wednesday, 19 March 2003 13:48:48 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Saturday, 22 July 2006 00:10:18 GMT