W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-ql@w3.org > January to March 2001

Re: Concern: XQuery <> valid XML

From: Anthony Finkelstein <a.finkelstein@cs.ucl.ac.uk>
Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2001 09:54:17 +0000
Message-Id: <v04210104b6c279019255@[]>
To: kifer@cs.sunysb.edu (Michael Kifer), Jeff Chapman <Jeff.Chapman@pervasive.com>
Cc: www-ql@w3.org
We have been developing an 'assertion language' and an associated 
checker. See http://www.xlinkit.com for the general approach and 
http://www.xlinkit.com/dangerzone for the latest version of the 
language and checker.

Though I can see the argument for a clean and elegant syntax, in our 
experience (which I would argue is strongly analogous to XQuery) the 
benefits of an XML representation have been overwhelming. Most 
notable have been (1) visualisation, (2) meta-level assertions, (3) 
tool building simplicity.



Anthony Finkelstein (Prof.) 	| TEL: +44 (0)20 7679 7293 (Direct Dial)
University College London	| FAX: +44 (0)20 7387 1397
Dept. of Computer Science   	| EMAIL: a.finkelstein@cs.ucl.ac.uk
Gower Street,                	| http://www.cs.ucl.ac.uk/staff/A.Finkelstein
London WC1E 6BT              	| OFFICE: 109, Pearson Building
United Kingdom               	| PGP Key on request
Received on Wednesday, 28 February 2001 04:55:11 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Saturday, 22 July 2006 00:10:17 GMT