W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-qa@w3.org > October 2007

RE: How to handle a Test Suite at W3C Re: Error in (approved) test 0009

From: Hausenblas, Michael <michael.hausenblas@joanneum.at>
Date: Tue, 9 Oct 2007 09:41:20 +0200
Message-ID: <768DACDC356ED04EA1F1130F97D2985201337E73@RZJC2EX.jr1.local>
To: <boland@nist.gov>
Cc: "Karl Dubost" <karl@w3.org>, "Dan Connolly" <connolly@w3.org>, "Ivan Herman" <ivan@w3.org>, "W3C RDFa task force" <public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org>, <www-qa@w3.org>


Tim,

Thanks for the pointer - very interesting stuff!

Cheers,
	Michael

----------------------------------------------------------
 Michael Hausenblas, MSc.
 Institute of Information Systems & Information Management
 JOANNEUM RESEARCH Forschungsgesellschaft mbH
  
 http://www.joanneum.at/iis/
----------------------------------------------------------
 

>-----Original Message-----
>From: boland@nist.gov [mailto:boland@nist.gov] 
>Sent: Monday, October 08, 2007 3:54 PM
>To: Hausenblas, Michael
>Cc: Karl Dubost; Dan Connolly; Ivan Herman; W3C RDFa task 
>force; www-qa@w3.org
>Subject: RE: How to handle a Test Suite at W3C Re: Error in 
>(approved) test 0009
>
>fyi - there is also a review process for WCAG2.0 Test Samples 
>Development Task 
>Force [1]
>
>Best, Tim Boland NIST
>
>[1]: http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/tests/process
>
>
>Quoting "Hausenblas, Michael" <michael.hausenblas@joanneum.at>:
>
>> 
>> 
>> Karl,
>> 
>> As a matter of practice, we now have (IMHO) a stable process.
>> 
>> First, whenever someone raises test cases (or proposes
>> concrete ones, such as done by Ivan [1] or Fabien [2])
>> the TF puts it on the agenda (see for example [3]).
>> 
>> We then regularly do the review & approval in the TF
>> (note that there is a tool supporting this process
>> available at [4]). The decisions (approve/on hold/reject/)
>> on each TC are finally recorded at [5].
>> 
>> This is the process as practiced and it seems to work fine ;)
>> 
>> Cheers,
>> 	Michael
>> 
>> [1]
>> 
>http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf/2007
Oct/0001.html
>> [2]
>> 
>http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf/2007
Sep/0069.html
>> [3] http://www.w3.org/2007/10/04-rdfa-minutes#item02
>> [4] http://sw.joanneum.at/rdfa/rdfadebug/index.php
>> [5] http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/wiki/RDFaTC 
>> 
>> ----------------------------------------------------------
>>  Michael Hausenblas, MSc.
>>  Institute of Information Systems & Information Management
>>  JOANNEUM RESEARCH Forschungsgesellschaft mbH
>>   
>>  http://www.joanneum.at/iis/
>> ----------------------------------------------------------
>>  
>> 
>> >-----Original Message-----
>> >From: Karl Dubost [mailto:karl@w3.org] 
>> >Sent: Monday, October 08, 2007 11:07 AM
>> >To: Hausenblas, Michael
>> >Cc: Dan Connolly; Ivan Herman; W3C RDFa task force; www-qa@w3.org
>> >Subject: Re: How to handle a Test Suite at W3C Re: Error in 
>> >(approved) test 0009
>> >
>> >Hi Michael
>> >
>> >Hausenblas, Michael (7 août 2007 - 15:10) :
>> >> However, what is missing IMHO are clear instructions how
>> >> to actually do the test *review*.
>> >
>> >Did you made progress on this, or did you decide of a Process?
>> >
>> >-- 
>> >Karl Dubost - http://www.w3.org/People/karl/
>> >W3C Conformance Manager, QA Activity Lead
>> >   QA Weblog - http://www.w3.org/QA/
>> >      *** Be Strict To Be Cool ***
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> 
>> 
>
>
>
Received on Tuesday, 9 October 2007 07:43:45 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:40:38 UTC