RE: [RDFa TC] Test Cases Vocabulary

David,

Thanks for the hint. We actually do already apply the TC metadata 
by the (former) QAWG--cf [1]. This proposal was just thought to be
a kind of extension ...

Cheers,
	Michael

[1] http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/RDFa/testsuite/#ManifestFiles

----------------------------------------------------------
 Michael Hausenblas, MSc.
 Institute of Information Systems & Information Management
 JOANNEUM RESEARCH Forschungsgesellschaft mbH
 Steyrergasse 17, A-8010 Graz, AUSTRIA
---------------------------------------------------------- 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: david_marston@us.ibm.com [mailto:david_marston@us.ibm.com] 
> Sent: Monday, March 26, 2007 9:44 PM
> To: Hausenblas, Michael; wingyung@us.ibm.com
> Cc: RDFa; www-qa@w3.org
> Subject: Re: [RDFa TC] Test Cases Vocabulary
> 
> Michael Hausenblas writes to Wing:
> >As recently announced [1], the Evaluation And Report Language (EARL) 
> >1.0 Schema is in the Last Call phase, now. How about utilising it in 
> >our RDFa Test Cases?
> 
> Note that the schema [2] is about test case results. If you 
> are seeking a method of cataloging the test cases themselves, 
> look at the QAWG note on Test Metadata [3] and the precedents 
> set by the XQuery Test Suite [4].
> .................David Marston
> IBM Research, Cambridge, MA
> 
> [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/semantic-web/2007Mar/0130.html
> [2] http://www.w3.org/TR/EARL10-Schema/
> [3] http://www.w3.org/TR/2005/NOTE-test-metadata-20050914/
> [4] http://www.w3.org/XML/Query/test-suite/
>