W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-qa@w3.org > October 2006

Web Quality Ideas

From: Simone Onofri <s.onofri@siatec.net>
Date: Fri, 6 Oct 2006 18:28:12 +0200
Message-ID: <52bd7c3d0610060928o73dfee3fud7e439259178cdaa@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Karl Dubost" <karl@w3.org>, www-qa@w3.org, public-evangelist@w3.org

Hi Karl and all QA-IG List,

I read documents "Buy standards compliant Web sites"[1] and "My Web
site is standard! And yours?". A good reading for company and private
that would like to have a site and, vice-versa, for web authors who
like to make a great web. So, there are not other articles from 2002.
There are more ideas to expand the Requirements? Like a guide or
reference? Also considering Unicorn[3] can be a good idea, sounds like
a marketing operation, using a Conformance Logo for Web Quality (like
WAI Conformance logo). This can be useful for tracking sites that uses
correctly W3C technologies, a problem - tracking good sites, explained
by Karl in a past mail to list regarding Google Stats.

For ideas, collaboration and writing, I'm available as a volunteer.
Also for Unicorn is great that funds of Contributing Supporters is
used for It. I'm happy for this!

Thanks for Your time and Best Regards,


[1] http://www.w3.org/QA/2002/07/WebAgency-Requirements
[2] http://www.w3.org/QA/2002/04/Web-Quality
[3] http://qa-dev.w3.org/unicorn/

-- 
Simone Onofri

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

W3C Contributing Supporter
Member of International Webmasters Association / HTML Writers Guild
Member of AICA: Italian Association for Computer and Automated Calculation
IWA Certified Web Professional Candidacy Status in HTML
Microsoft Certified Preinstallation Specialist
Microsoft Certified Sales Specialist
Microsoft Certified Licensing Specialist
Brainbench Certified Internet Professional Web Designer
Brainbench Certified Internet Professional Web Developer

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Received on Friday, 6 October 2006 16:28:23 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:40:37 UTC