W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-qa@w3.org > January 2005

Re: QASG last call comments: "Define an error handling mechanism" comments

From: Karl Dubost <karl@w3.org>
Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2005 10:00:37 -0500
Message-Id: <64c863083cda948d761bab4ec649f1b6@w3.org>
Cc: www-qa@w3.org
To: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1


Le 19 janv. 2005, à 09:55, Ian Hickson a écrit :
> Also, this section should spend more time on the concepts of
> mustIgnore and mustUnderstand (and why the camelCase?). Both have

camelCase seems indeed inappropriate


> their places: mustUnderstand is important when data corruption could
> end up having critical consequences (e.g. a corrupted credit card
> transaction could be costly), whereas mustIgnore is important when the
> worst effect data corruption could have is a slightly degraded
> rendering (e.g. a corrupted stylesheet).

It's why there's the reference to the Web architecture document because 
they are not concepts defined by QA WG. Maybe we could link to more 
online materials if available.




- -- 
Karl Dubost - http://www.w3.org/People/karl/
W3C Conformance Manager
*** Be Strict To Be Cool ***
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (Darwin)

iD8DBQFB/kgV+dmsZnpx3tkRAop6AKCZTChGvGPtsT6uDB++UHVDdwskCQCfXcpn
IVO7nChrCbgfxSH+pskpsGQ=
=hPs3
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Received on Monday, 31 January 2005 15:00:39 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:40:36 UTC