W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-qa@w3.org > January 2005

QA Framework: Specification Guidelines: Umbrella specification

From: Gary Feldman <g1list_1a@marsdome.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2005 09:36:12 -0500
Message-ID: <41F7AADC.1010104@marsdome.com>
To: W3C QA Interest Group <www-qa@w3.org>

Is the entire discussion of umbrella specifications really necessary?  
The word "umbrella" isn't used anywhere else in the document, and I'm 
not sure that the concept is mentioned elsewhere.  I think it's enough 
to have just the first two sentences "Specifications can be defined in 
one or several ....in a well defined manner," but delete the clause 
"denoted below as umbrella specifications" along with the figure and the 
paragraph explaining the figure. 

The idea of a composite document isn't rocket science, and doesn't 
deserve this much space - at least not unless it played a more prominent 
role later in the document.

Received on Wednesday, 26 January 2005 14:38:16 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:40:36 UTC