W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-qa@w3.org > January 2005

QASG last call comments: Case of RFC2119 terms

From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2005 14:54:29 +0000 (UTC)
To: www-qa@w3.org
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.61.0501191454240.7711@dhalsim.dreamhost.com>


"3.2 Requirement A: Use a consistent style for conformance
requirements and explain how to distinguish them." mentions that
RFC2119 terms are uppercase, but it should be noted that nothing in
RFC2119 (other than consistent usage as such) requires them to be used
in uppercase, despite specifications frequently explicitly mentioning
that they use lowercase variants instead.

-- 
Ian Hickson               U+1047E                )\._.,--....,'``.    fL
http://ln.hixie.ch/       U+263A                /,   _.. \   _\  ;`._ ,.
Things that are impossible just take longer.   `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Wednesday, 19 January 2005 14:54:30 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Sunday, 6 December 2009 12:14:01 GMT