- From: Dan Brickley <danbri@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 2 Feb 2005 13:38:30 -0500
- To: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Cc: www-qa@w3.org, www-rdf-comments@w3.org
* Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org> [2005-02-02 12:13-0600] > > My experience is that untested hooks are bad; really bad. Please > share this experience with your readers. > > This bit of SpecGL seems relevant, though not exactly the "untested > hooks are bad" bumper-sticker I'd like to see: > > Make sure there is a need for the optional feature. > 4.2 Good Practice A: in 4. Managing Variability of SpecGL > > The 1999 RDF spec had a couple hooks that were not well tested [...] +1 RDF Schema had the 'ConstraintResource' hook, which was also (while it was good to try to anticipate things like OWL coming along) a flawed design - we never defined 'constraint'. Dan
Received on Wednesday, 2 February 2005 18:38:32 UTC