On Mon, 31 Jan 2005, Karl Dubost wrote: > > You are saying that the structure now is: > > 2. (h3) > 2.2 (h4) > 2.2 req A (h4) > 2.3 (h4) > 2.3 req A (h4) > 2.3 req B (h4) > > And you recommend to be > > 2. (h3) > 2.2 (h4) > 2.2 req A (h5) > 2.3 (h4) > 2.3 req A (h5) > 2.3 req B (h5) Yes please. -- Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'Received on Wednesday, 2 February 2005 14:54:28 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 27 October 2009 08:33:52 GMT