- From: James Pickering <jp29@cox.net>
- Date: Sat, 6 Aug 2005 14:47:05 -0700
- To: <www-qa@w3.org>
I wrote .......... > ........................... but at my age I can handle such > dissapointments with aplomb. Back to HTML 4.01. .......... but obviously not spelling: _disappointments_ I do beg a question: why do the W3C staff writers employ XHTML 1.0 (mostly Strict) served as content type text/html when the W3C recommended practice is to serve it as application/xhtml+xml ? Even the W3C page http://www.w3.org/2003/01/xhtml-mimetype/content-negotiation is served this way. James Pickering http://www.jp29.org/ HTML 4.01 (Strict)
Received on Saturday, 6 August 2005 21:47:13 UTC