W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-qa@w3.org > August 2005

Re: XHTML 1.0 Content-Negotiation

From: James Pickering <jp29@cox.net>
Date: Sat, 6 Aug 2005 14:47:05 -0700
Message-ID: <000d01c59ad0$63602e90$0200a8c0@jp29>
To: <www-qa@w3.org>

I wrote ..........

> ........................... but at my age I can handle such 
> dissapointments with aplomb. Back to HTML 4.01.

.......... but obviously not spelling:  _disappointments_

I do beg a question: why do the W3C staff writers employ XHTML 1.0 (mostly 
Strict) served as content type text/html when the W3C recommended practice 
is to serve it as  application/xhtml+xml ? Even the W3C page 
http://www.w3.org/2003/01/xhtml-mimetype/content-negotiation is served this 
way.

James Pickering
http://www.jp29.org/
HTML 4.01 (Strict)
Received on Saturday, 6 August 2005 21:47:13 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Sunday, 6 December 2009 12:14:01 GMT