Re: Does W3C Document License prohibit profiles?

* Lofton Henderson wrote:
>>No right to create modifications or derivatives of W3C documents is 
                                                     ^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>>granted pursuant to this license. However, if additional requirements 
>>(documented in the Copyright FAQ) are satisfied, the right to create 
>>modifications or derivatives is sometimes granted by the W3C to 
>>individuals complying with those requirements.
>
>I think a profile is certainly a derivative work of its base standard -- it 
                                                         ^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>defines a subset of the base standard.  Is it a derivative in the sense of 
>the Document License?  I don't know.  One would hope that the Copyright FAQ 
>[2] would say something like "Profiles are okay, as long as they clearly 
>distinguished themselves from the base REC."  But no.  The section on 
>Annotation (5.8) flirts with the topic, but doesn't deal with it head on.

The document licence deals with the documentation, not with what is
documented, don't you think?

Received on Thursday, 4 November 2004 18:32:49 UTC