- From: Al Gilman <Alfred.S.Gilman@IEEE.org>
- Date: Thu, 22 Jul 2004 14:30:29 -0400
- To: (wrong string) ël-Massieux <dom@w3.org>
- Cc: www-qa@w3.org
At 5:55 PM +0200 7/22/04, Bjoern Hoehrmann wrote: >* Dominique Hazaël-Massieux wrote: >>It would be great if someone had the time to look further on whether >>some of the points in the article should inspire new good practices or >>techniques in SpecGL; I may end up doing it next week, but would love to >>see contributions from others :) > >Copy and paste from http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/doc/versioning might also >work... Sure, *if* the TAG thought they were done with the issue. Yes, the TAG has accepted an issue in this area. But they haven't signed out a consensus finding. So it is still likely that the new article will add something of value to the discussion. I forwarded Dom's mention of the new article to their list. http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2004Jul/0013.html Al
Received on Thursday, 22 July 2004 14:32:21 UTC