- From: Karl Dubost <karl@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 9 Dec 2004 09:36:52 -0500
- To: www-qa@w3.org
Hi,
I have done a review [1] of xml:id Last Call [2] specification with the
Text ICS template [3] of SpecGL version Nov 22, 2004
We may have one candidate that would please Mark Skall.
I will quote my message to the XML WG
[[[
The Good News:
xml:id is almost conformant to QA SpecGL LC version Nov 22, 2004
if you modify the specification for
- 3.2.B "Indicate which conformance requirements
are mandatory, which are recommended and
which are optional."
- 4.3.A "Address Extensibility"
which are both really easy to meet. It's just a question of
wording.
]]] - [1]
[1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-id/2004Dec/0009
[2] http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/WD-xml-id-20041109/
[3] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-qa-wg/2004Dec/0008
[4] http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/WD-qaframe-spec-20041122/
--
Karl Dubost - http://www.w3.org/People/karl/
W3C Conformance Manager
*** Be Strict To Be Cool ***
Received on Thursday, 9 December 2004 14:36:52 UTC