> * http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-phillips-langtags-01.txt > >>It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference >>material or to cite them other than as "work in progress." > > > I am citing the draft because I couldn't locate any RFC that supersedes it. > > Thank you, > Rajasekaran Deepak > In the fullness of time it will supersede RFC 3066 (I hope), although my guess is that there will be a draft-phillips-langtags-02 before that (just a fairly uninformed guess). I am not sure what RFC 3066 says, the para I quoted does genuinely reflect actual practice, so I haven't pushed too hard on it in the ietf list (despite not liking it much) JeremyReceived on Thursday, 1 April 2004 10:55:56 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 27 October 2009 08:33:51 GMT