Le mar 09/09/2003 à 06:19, Bjoern Hoehrmann a écrit : > * Dominique Hazaël-Massieux wrote: > >I think it already does so: > >- CP 2.1 -> " A specification MUST list the classes of product for which > >it defines conformance requirements; [...]" > > So XSLT 1.0 does not conform to this checkpoint? Likely; XSLT 1.O only defines conformance of processors: http://www.w3.org/TR/xslt#conformance and says nothing about conformance of content (i.e. what is a conformant XSLT style sheet?). Dom -- Dominique Hazaël-Massieux - http://www.w3.org/People/Dom/ W3C/ERCIM mailto:dom@w3.orgReceived on Tuesday, 9 September 2003 03:29:19 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 27 October 2009 08:33:50 GMT