- From: Karl Dubost <karl@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 5 Sep 2003 14:18:55 -0400
- To: www-qa@w3.org
Le jeudi, 4 sep 2003, à 17:34 America/Montreal, Bjoern Hoehrmann a écrit : > > information". How would you "test" for example > > <address > xml:lang='x-bjoernhoehrmannish'>##39(ö)64..werhq%__</address> > > whether it meets my hypothetical requirements? It could be exact. If it meets an address scheme. Yes. The XHTML Spec doesn't say what must be your address scheme, you are free to choose. If you think that address is not testable, it should not be in the spec at all. On a side note, I have commented on XHTML 2.0, to have precise way of describing profiles, etc to have more interoperability. You address scheme can be part of an extensible ontology. It's exactly the same problem when you have an image and you have an "alt" attribute. The content of the alt attribute must describe the image, but the semiotics is something which is very subjective, even more than the one for address. REC WCAG 1.0 http://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG10/wai-pageauth.html#tech-text-equivalent WD WCAG 2.0 http://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG20/#text-equiv -- Karl Dubost - http://www.w3.org/People/karl/ W3C Conformance Manager *** Be Strict To Be Cool ***
Received on Friday, 5 September 2003 14:19:16 UTC