W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-qa@w3.org > September 2003

Re: [qaframe-spec] conformance tools vs. broken specs

From: Lofton Henderson <lofton@rockynet.com>
Date: Thu, 04 Sep 2003 08:19:10 -0600
Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.2.20030904081738.022faab0@localhost>
To: Karl Dubost <karl@w3.org>, Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>
Cc: www-qa@w3.org


At 09:56 AM 9/4/2003 -0400, Karl Dubost wrote:
>[...]
>Please comment only on published version (not on editor's draft), because 
>it makes our work difficult.

Or join and actively participate in QAWG!

-Lofton.

Received on Thursday, 4 September 2003 10:35:50 GMT

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: david_marston@us.ibm.com: "Re: [qaframe-spec] What is an implementation?"
Previous message: Karl Dubost: "Final: Minutes QAWG telecon Monday 25 August"
In reply to: Karl Dubost: "Re: [qaframe-spec] conformance tools vs. broken specs"

Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]
Help: [ How to use the archives ] [ Search in the archives ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Sunday, 6 December 2009 12:14:00 GMT