Re: [qaframe-spec] What is testable?

"Bjoern Hoehrmann" <derhoermi@gmx.net>
> you could for example say that
> something is testable if one could reasonably expect conformance testing
> software to proof it.

Testable should be able to encompass things which are not currently likely
to be software computable, human testing could be sufficient, as long as
pass/fail wasn't subjective.

> I would suggest to choose a better term as "tests" are commonly
> perceived as involving automated process;

I don't agree fully agree with this, it's certainly one meaning, but not the
only.

Jim.