W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-qa@w3.org > September 2003

Re: [qaframe-spec] What is an implementation?

From: Alex Rousskov <rousskov@measurement-factory.com>
Date: Wed, 3 Sep 2003 12:03:21 -0600 (MDT)
To: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>
Cc: www-qa@w3.org
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.53.0309031200260.77720@measurement-factory.com>


On Wed, 3 Sep 2003, Bjoern Hoehrmann wrote:

>   The current Specification Guidelines document
> <http://www.w3.org/QA/WG/2003/08/qaframe-spec> does not define what it
> consideres an implementation. For example, is a MathML document
> considered an implementation of the MathML specification? If it is
> considered an implementation, this should be made explicit. If it is not
> considered an implementation, the document lacks checkpoints for
> documents, it is for example nowadays quite common for web authors to
> include conformance claims for their web site on their web site but
> Guideline 9 only considers "implementations".

Would it be sufficient to say that "implementation" is anything that
is a subject to specification's conformance statement (explicit or
implied)?

That would cover software, documents, specifications (e.g. a spec may
contain conformance requirements for other specs describing protocol
bindings or optional modules), etc.

Alex.

-- 
                            | HTTP performance - Web Polygraph benchmark
www.measurement-factory.com | HTTP compliance+ - Co-Advisor test suite
                            | all of the above - PolyBox appliance
Received on Wednesday, 3 September 2003 14:03:25 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Sunday, 6 December 2009 12:14:00 GMT