- From: Terje Bless <link@pobox.com>
- Date: Fri, 30 May 2003 19:17:42 +0200
- To: W3C QA IG <www-qa@w3.org>
- cc: Lofton Henderson <lofton@rockynet.com>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Lofton Henderson <lofton@rockynet.com> wrote: >Ref: http://www.w3.org/QA/WG/2003/05/SpecGL-MathML20-review.html <http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http://www.w3.org/QA/WG/2003/05/SpecGL- MathML20-review.html> 70 errors? Most of which are banal HTML syntax in XHTML or bad nesting of elements... For shame! :-) What can the Validator do to make it easier to integrate validation into the publishing workflow for QA in general? Or perhaps specifically for SpecGL reviews? - -- Now Playing "I Loves You Porgy" by "Nina Simone" from the album "Feeling Good - The Very Best Of". -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: PGP SDK 3.0.2 iQA/AwUBPteSNKPyPrIkdfXsEQIiDgCgiXJqp8LP0fj0w/4R8SP5kCCEyy8AoL87 XFwrgTZc4vHfgN5Vn1f6Ma6u =JvDu -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Received on Friday, 30 May 2003 13:18:06 UTC