W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-qa@w3.org > May 2003

Dogfood... (was: MathML 2.0, second edition)

From: Terje Bless <link@pobox.com>
Date: Fri, 30 May 2003 19:17:42 +0200
To: W3C QA IG <www-qa@w3.org>
cc: Lofton Henderson <lofton@rockynet.com>
Message-ID: <f02000001-1026-9F587BB492C211D7AA0E0030657B83E8@[193.157.66.23]>

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Lofton Henderson <lofton@rockynet.com> wrote:

>Ref:  http://www.w3.org/QA/WG/2003/05/SpecGL-MathML20-review.html

<http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http://www.w3.org/QA/WG/2003/05/SpecGL-
MathML20-review.html>

70 errors? Most of which are banal HTML syntax in XHTML or bad nesting of
elements... For shame! :-)


What can the Validator do to make it easier to integrate validation into the
publishing workflow for QA in general? Or perhaps specifically for SpecGL
reviews?


- -- 
Now Playing "I Loves You Porgy" by "Nina Simone"
 from the album "Feeling Good - The Very Best Of".

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP SDK 3.0.2

iQA/AwUBPteSNKPyPrIkdfXsEQIiDgCgiXJqp8LP0fj0w/4R8SP5kCCEyy8AoL87
XFwrgTZc4vHfgN5Vn1f6Ma6u
=JvDu
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Received on Friday, 30 May 2003 13:18:06 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:40:32 UTC