W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-qa@w3.org > January 2003

Re: per-Framework glossary sections

From: David Marston/Cambridge/IBM <david_marston@us.ibm.com>
Date: Fri, 3 Jan 2003 12:53:36 -0500
To: www-qa@w3.org
Message-ID: <OFF14DB7B8.73D08708-ON85256CA3.0061DFBB-85256CA3.0062B9DD@lotus.com>

Can you explain the normativity implications? If I'm on track, the
QA Glossary is not a normative document, but the various QA Guidelines
documents will be. Thus, any attempt to assess how well a testable
item conforms to those guidelines will need normative definitions.

If a QA document had a Definitions section, and there was a term whose
entry said just "see QA Glossary", would that promote the term from
Informative to Normative for purposes of that document?
.................David Marston
Received on Friday, 3 January 2003 12:58:58 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:40:30 UTC