W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-qa@w3.org > October 2002

Re: TOC checkpoints

From: Alex Rousskov <rousskov@measurement-factory.com>
Date: Sun, 27 Oct 2002 13:11:16 -0700 (MST)
To: Lofton Henderson <lofton@rockynet.com>
cc: www-qa@w3.org
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.44.0210271307070.31166-100000@measurement-factory.com>

On Sun, 27 Oct 2002, Lofton Henderson wrote:

> Can you point to "mature" /TR/ documents that don't have TOC

FWIW, RFC 2119 (which is used by SpecGL, BTW) does not have a TOC and
probably would not benefit much from one.

	http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2119.txt

Alex.

-- 
                            | HTTP performance - Web Polygraph benchmark
www.measurement-factory.com | HTTP compliance+ - Co-Advisor test suite
                            | all of the above - PolyBox appliance
Received on Sunday, 27 October 2002 15:11:20 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Sunday, 6 December 2009 12:13:59 GMT