W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-qa@w3.org > May 2002

(unknown charset) Re: Testable assertion tagging for W3C specifications

From: (unknown charset) Alex Rousskov <rousskov@measurement-factory.com>
Date: Mon, 27 May 2002 10:56:46 -0600 (MDT)
To: (unknown charset) Dimitris Dimitriadis <dimitris@ontologicon.com>
cc: (unknown charset) www-qa@w3.org
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.10.10205271039240.34500-100000@measurement-factory.com>
On Mon, 27 May 2002, Dimitris Dimitriadis wrote:

> > GOALS:
> >    Allow an external document (test case, erratum, email, etc.) to point
> >    directly at a "testable" normative sentence in a Recommendation.
> >
> > [dd] This would clearly simplify the task of, if we look at tests, 
> > knowing which part in particualr is being tested, but requires 
> > structure and issues tracking. This in turn implies that it may need to 
> > be an intra-W3C "standard".
>
> [dd] The "standard" I mention here would be the testable assertion 
> markup we've discussed and the linking technique (pointing to a testable 
> assertion from a part of the actual test, say).

From technical point of view, "pointing to normative sentence in a
Recommendation" does not imply a need for structure or W3C
documentation standard. An external document can point to normative
sentences using a variety of already available techniques, which will
depend on the format of the Recommendation and on the test tool
preferences.

In the extreme case, one can use byte offsets and a simple rendering
engine to highlight relevant citations. In many cases, approaches like
XPath/XPointer could be used. Also, linking using short quotes (rather
than some sort of addresses) can simplify maintaining the index across
Recommendation changes.

Yes, having a one-for-all standard will simplify linking and tracking
document updates until the document becomes stable. However, it is not
clear to me whether these somewhat temporary advantages outweigh the
drawbacks of one-size-fits-all approach and introduction of yet
another standard.

$0.02,

Alex.
Received on Monday, 27 May 2002 12:56:51 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:40:29 UTC