W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-qa@w3.org > May 2002

Re: levels/options considered harmful

From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
Date: 16 May 2002 23:16:54 -0500
To: Karl Dubost <karl@w3.org>
Cc: www-qa@w3.org, Jim Hendler <hendler@cs.umd.edu>
Message-Id: <1021609015.2294.128.camel@dirk>
On Thu, 2002-05-16 at 22:59, Karl Dubost wrote:
[...]
> As I said the guidelines 3 is not about the content of the 
> conformance clause, is about what kind of requirements you have to do 
> if you put a conformance clause in your spec as an editor.

So add another guideline or something. Just make sure
the QA guidelines makes the point that levels/options
are best avoided (unless you disagree, in which
case please explain why).

> So you still miss the point, IMHO.

Likewise.


-- 
Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
Received on Friday, 17 May 2002 00:41:05 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:40:29 UTC