W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-qa@w3.org > December 2002

Re: new Guidelines drafts posted

From: Lofton Henderson <lofton@rockynet.com>
Date: Mon, 30 Dec 2002 14:18:40 -0700
Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.2.20021230141549.020e00f0@rockynet.com>
To: Alex Rousskov <rousskov@measurement-factory.com>
Cc: www-qa@w3.org

Okay, this is fixed now.  Both SpecGL and the checklist are updated to fix 
the links.  Now these two file properly reference each other, and the 
checklist corresponds to the checkpoints in SpecGL:

http://www.w3.org/2002/12/QA/WG/qaframe-spec-20021220
http://www.w3.org/2002/12/QA/WG/qaframe-spec-checklist-20021220

-Lofton.

At 11:58 AM 12/30/2002 -0700, Lofton Henderson wrote:

>Thanks for the heads-up, Alex.
>
>Actually, it is worse than you say.  The checklist that is there does not 
>correspond to the 20021220 SpecGL version.  It is an old one.  See for 
>example the first couple of checkpoints of GL9 or GL10.
>
>I'll see if I can do something about it.  Meanwhile, please ignore the 
>Checklist.
>
>-Lofton.
>
>At 09:14 AM 12/30/2002 -0700, you wrote:
>
>
>>FYI: Links to SpecGL checkpoints in [1] point to OpsGL document [2],
>>resulting in 404 Not Found erros. Manually replacing -ops with -spec
>>in the link URL fixes the problem.
>>
>>     [1] http://www.w3.org/QA/WG/2002/12/qaframe-spec-checklist.html
>>     [2] http://www.w3.org/QA/WG/2002/12/qaframe-ops
>>
>>Alex.
>>
>>--
>>                             | HTTP performance - Web Polygraph benchmark
>>www.measurement-factory.com | HTTP compliance+ - Co-Advisor test suite
>>                             | all of the above - PolyBox appliance
>
>
Received on Monday, 30 December 2002 16:23:04 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:40:30 UTC