W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-qa@w3.org > August 2002

Re: conformance vs. compliance

From: Dominique HazaŽl-Massieux <dom@w3.org>
Date: 09 Aug 2002 18:12:01 +0200
To: Alex Rousskov <rousskov@measurement-factory.com>
Cc: Mark Skall <mark.skall@nist.gov>, Lofton Henderson <lofton@rockynet.com>, Art.Barstow@nokia.com, www-qa@w3.org
Message-Id: <1028909523.16657.265.camel@stratustier>

Le ven 09/08/2002 ŗ 18:04, Alex Rousskov a ťcrit :

> If QA WG doesn't encourage something, it would be a good policy to
> explain why. So far, I have not seen any objective reasons why one
> word should be preferred to another.

Hmm... What about :
Mark Skall > Let's not proliferate additional terms. We should encourage
> the use of "conformance".  That's the word we use.
and 
Lynne Rosenthal > compliance has been used more with a marketing
> connotation

Dom
-- 
Dominique HazaŽl-Massieux - http://www.w3.org/People/Dom/
W3C/INRIA
mailto:dom@w3.org
Received on Friday, 9 August 2002 12:12:07 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Sunday, 6 December 2009 12:13:59 GMT