- From: Dimitris Dimitriadis <dimitris@ontologicon.com>
- Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2001 17:14:45 +0300
- To: Lofton Henderson <lofton@rockynet.com>
- Cc: Alex Rousskov <rousskov@measurement-factory.com>, "Sean B. Palmer" <sean@mysterylights.com>, Rob Lanphier <robla@real.com>, www-qa@w3.org
Thanks for the pointer, I obviously haven't done my homework. Best, /Dimitris On Friday, October 19, 2001, at 01:14 AM, Lofton Henderson wrote: > At 10:27 PM 10/18/01 +0300, Dimitris Dimitriadis wrote: >> [...] >> The thing I would personally like to have discussed is this: What is >> the W3C _official_ position on testing, interdependancy and >> conformance? Given the fact, for example, that the DOM TS has not >> officially been used as an experience tank for subsequent test suites >> (at least not to my knowledge), thus not coordinating this with later >> efforts, should there perhaps be a clause in the specs that indicates >> how test suite should be written in a coordinated fashion? I'm afraid >> we may be missing the forest for the trees by moving in too many >> directions at once eventually ending up with incompatible testing >> frameworks. > > This fits the goals of the QA activity, and some work on common > framework will likely be prioritized as one of the early deliverables. > In Section 2 of the QAWG charter, > > http://www.w3.org/QA/WG/charter.html, > > see the 2nd bullet and the 2nd-to-last bullet. > > -Lofton. >
Received on Friday, 19 October 2001 10:21:01 UTC