I think the process you outline makes sense. Auditing is already something we're doing for Accessibility, I18N, and soon Device Independance. > How would a QA activity interact with other activities? > > Would the QA members work in a purely advisory role to other groups > or would the activity have some authority to impose certain standards? > > If advisory, would QA input only come by invitation of the activity, or > would each activity have QA members involved/assigned to steer the work on > QA issues? > > An activity could adopt a certain QA policy (such as itemised by David > Marston) > and then request the QA group to audit their work. > > Acceptance criteria could be set for certain activities with QA acting as > adjudicators - or advisors to a higher authority. > > > Andrew ThackrahReceived on Wednesday, 25 April 2001 06:35:37 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 27 October 2009 08:33:46 GMT