W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-qa-wg@w3.org > September 2005

Re: Resend: Metadata document edits

From: Patrick Curran <Patrick.Curran@Sun.COM>
Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2005 12:29:23 -0700
To: Karl Dubost <karl@w3.org>
Cc: QAWG <www-qa-wg@w3.org>
Message-id: <43272893.8020407@sun.com>

Karl Dubost wrote:

> Thanks Patrick,
> the document seems to be in a good shape, I have almost finished to  
> prepare it for publication. Though I have one comment. There was a  
> mention that we would flag an issue for versioning
> See the minutes.
> [[[
> Versioning?  After discussion, decided to keep it and incorporate  
> DM's comments as an issue to be flagged in the document.
> ]]] - http://www.w3.org/mid/
I thought I'd done so with this text:

* 2.10 Comment: add "It is unclear whether it is necessary to apply 
version numbers to individual tests. More common practice is to version 
the entire test suite. Ideally tests will not need to be revised as the 
specification evolves. However, this is sometimes necessary, and at a 
minimum each Working Group should define SpecRef and possibly other 
metadata such as Grouping elements to indicate which versions of the 
specification an individual test supports."

If you think that the "it is unclear whether it is necessary" language 
is too vague could you perhaps suggest an alternative?
Received on Tuesday, 13 September 2005 19:29:12 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:14:36 UTC