Re: SpecGL implementation report, 2nd draft

Thanks, Karl

Looks good to me, in addition it shows better coverage at the top 
(requirements), which is a good thing.

Best,

/Dimitris

On May 13, 2005, at 8:56 PM, Karl Dubost wrote:

> Hi Dom, Dimitris,
>
>
> Le 05-05-13 à 09:42, Dominique Hazaël-Massieux a écrit :
>> I've uploaded the new document at:
>> http://www.w3.org/QA/WG/2005/04/specgl-implementation-report.html
>> (linked from the WG home page)
>
> Wonderful job, you have done. Chapeaux bas !!!
>
> Maybe and only if it's easy to do:
>     the summary table could have all requirements and all good 
> practices grouped together?
>
> Oh… well… a few cut and paste and....
>
> What do you think about it?
>
> <specgl-implementation-report2.html>
>
> -- 
> Karl Dubost - http://www.w3.org/People/karl/
> W3C Conformance Manager
> *** Be Strict To Be Cool ***
>
>