W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-qa-wg@w3.org > May 2005

Re: [DRAFT] Review of SVG 1.2 Tiny Last Call

From: Karl Dubost <karl@w3.org>
Date: Tue, 10 May 2005 16:36:55 -0400
Message-Id: <8D02EDE4-7E14-4E55-A20A-A6C4FED774AD@w3.org>
To: "'www-qa-wg@w3.org'" <www-qa-wg@w3.org>


thanks for the useful comments.

Le 05-05-10 ŗ 04:11, Dominique HazaŽl-Massieux a ťcrit :
>> this is a first pass,
> Wow, that was fast!

If you consider 4 days of work, plus one long day yesterday from 1pm  
to 7pm without raising the nose is fast ;) So yes I agree. :p

> Hmm... They're saying "is in conformance with", not "is conformant  
> to",
> which I understand with a different meaning. Maybe they could use a
> different wording to avoid this kind of problem, e.g. "It is believed
> that this specification is in accordance with the Web Architecture
> principles as described in AWWW".
> (FWIW, I still think it was a mistake for AWWW not to include a
> conformance section, precisely for this reason...)

It might be a mistake, but that's another problem ;) It's not here  
for now. Your suggestion is good.

>> E. QA ICS
>> http://www.w3.org/TR/2005/WD-SVGMobile12-20050413/qa-ics.html
>> Comment: Doesn't include the full ICS and new version of it. Not your
>> mistake.
> Maybe you can elaborate a bit on this; you and I understand well  
> why so,
> but probably not your readers :)

Yes I will ;)
>>  QA WG has done it for you @@Link to the ICS@@

One more thing done. It was faster ;)

Karl Dubost - http://www.w3.org/People/karl/
W3C Conformance Manager
*** Be Strict To Be Cool ***
Received on Tuesday, 10 May 2005 20:37:00 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:14:35 UTC