Draft Proposed Answer to Jeremy Carroll [amended]

[Amended to point to published WD of SpecGL]

Thank you for your SpecGL review comments [1].  We especially appreciate 
the positive feedback, about what you think works well in SpecGL.  Your 
single identified substantive issue regarding identification of deprecated 
features, versus first versions of specifications, was entered as issue 
#1051 [2].  The QA Working Group accepted the comment, and we have revised 
the wording around Requirement 12 [3] to indicate that the requirement is 
contingent on there being previous version(s) of the specification.

[1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-qa/2005Jan/0018.html
[2] http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=1051
[3] 
http://www.w3.org/TR/2005/WD-qaframe-spec-20050428/#deprecated-feature-principle