RE: Draft minutes Boston F2F, 4 Friday 2005 AM - story

At 07:54 AM 3/14/2005 -0500, Lynne S. Rosenthal wrote:

>The point of the story is conveyed - that is, do good quality control
>(review your own work), and you may have less hassles, comments, rewriting,
>negativity, etc.  Whether the story is completely accurate is not really the
>point here.

I agree.  It's a good story.

But if it's not accurate, it should not be attributed (this applies for any 
attribution to *anyone*, not just the QA case).  So:

1.) leave as is, un-attributed
2.) or, add attribution and reword for accuracy.

-Lofton.