W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-qa-wg@w3.org > March 2005

Re: [SpecGL] 1044 - Case of RFC2119 terms

From: Dominique HazaŽl-Massieux <dom@w3.org>
Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2005 11:25:05 +0100
To: Karl Dubost <karl@w3.org>
Cc: www-qa-wg@w3.org
Message-Id: <1110795906.11665.483.camel@stratustier>
Le jeudi 10 mars 2005 ŗ 15:44 -0500, Karl Dubost a ťcrit :
> New Text:
> 
> Using RFC 2119 [RFC2119] Keywords (MUST, SHOULD, MAY, ...) makes it 
> easy to spot conformance requirements; according to the RFC itself, 
> they should be used only to establish interoperation 
> [WIKI-RFC-KEYWORDS]. They may be written with an uppercase formatting 
> and/or a specific markup (See the Manual of Style).

To accommodate Lofton's remark - which makes sense to me-, we could say:
"They are usually" in stead of "they may be"

Dom
-- 
Dominique HazaŽl-Massieux - http://www.w3.org/People/Dom/
W3C/ERCIM
mailto:dom@w3.org


Received on Monday, 14 March 2005 10:25:19 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 + w3c-0.30 : Thursday, 9 June 2005 12:13:20 GMT