W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-qa-wg@w3.org > June 2005

Fwd: RE: Objection to resolution of LC comment [was: Answer to Paul Grosso about Classes of Products]

From: Mark Skall <mark.skall@nist.gov>
Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2005 20:10:56 -0400
Message-Id: <6.0.0.22.2.20050620200856.01e6fe78@mailserver.nist.gov>
To: www-qa-wg@w3.org

FYI.

Mark


>X-Sieve: CMU Sieve 2.2
>Subject: RE: Objection to resolution of LC comment  [was: Answer to Paul 
>Grosso about Classes of Products]
>Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2005 16:13:20 -0400
>X-MS-Has-Attach:
>X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
>Thread-Topic: Objection to resolution of LC comment  [was: Answer to Paul 
>Grosso about Classes of Products]
>Thread-Index: AcVxE/rW1PUfymntQGa9DuIKKuf7hAABWd6AAACKgxABLa/yMAAAiLWA
>From: "Paul Grosso" <pgrosso@arbortext.com>
>To: "Mark W. Skall" <mark.skall@nist.gov>
>Cc: "Mark Skall" <mskall@nist.gov>
>X-OriginalArrivalTime: 20 Jun 2005 20:14:05.0424 (UTC) 
>FILETIME=[9B9D9700:01C575D4]
>X-MailScanner:
>X-MailScanner-From: pgrosso@arbortext.com
>
>Mark,
>
>Thanks for taking the time to call and talk last week.
>
>I have just sent email withdrawing my objection.
>
>paul
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Mark W. Skall [mailto:mark.skall@nist.gov]
> > Sent: Monday, 20 June, 2005 15:02
> > To: Paul Grosso
> > Cc: Mark Skall
> > Subject: RE: Objection to resolution of LC comment [was:
> > Answer to Paul Grosso about Classes of Products]
> >
> > Paul,
> >
> > I briefed the QA WG on our discussion last week.  It would be
> > helpful to us if you could send an e-mail to the effect that
> > we've reached an agreement on the issue and that you withdraw
> > your formal objection.
> >
> > Please let me know if this is feasible.
> >
> > Thanks.
> >
> > Mark
> >
> >
> > ****************************************************************
> > Mark Skall
> > Chief, Software Diagnostics and Conformance Testing Division
> > Information Technology Laboratory
> > National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST)
> > 100 Bureau Drive, Stop 8970
> > Gaithersburg, MD 20899-8970
> >
> > Voice: 301-975-3262
> > Fax:   301-590-9174
> > Email: skall@nist.gov
> > ****************************************************************
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Paul Grosso [mailto:pgrosso@arbortext.com]
> > > Sent: Tuesday, June 14, 2005 4:01 PM
> > > To: Mark W. Skall; Karl Dubost
> > > Cc: qa-chairs@w3.org; Mark Skall
> > > Subject: RE: Objection to resolution of LC comment [was:
> > Answer to Paul
> > > Grosso about Classes of Products]
> > >
> > > Mark,
> > >
> > > I've got you down for Thursday 10:00 ET.
> > >
> > > Call me at +1 512 347 0311.
> > >
> > > paul
> > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: Mark W. Skall [mailto:mark.skall@nist.gov]
> > > > Sent: Tuesday, 14 June, 2005 14:48
> > > > To: Karl Dubost; Paul Grosso
> > > > Cc: qa-chairs@w3.org; Mark Skall
> > > > Subject: RE: Objection to resolution of LC comment [was:
> > > > Answer to Paul Grosso about Classes of Products]
> > > >
> > > > Paul,
> > > >
> > > > Right now, Thursday is wide open for me.  That may change
> > > > since we are briefing many Congressional staffers these days
> > > > on NIST work.
> > > >
> > > > Let's schedule something and I'll let you know in the
> > > > unlikely event something else comes up.
> > > >
> > > > How about Thursday at 10 A.M.?
> > > >
> > > > What phone number shall I use to call you?
> > > >
> > > > Mark
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > ****************************************************************
> > > > Mark Skall
> > > > Chief, Software Diagnostics and Conformance Testing Division
> > > > Information Technology Laboratory
> > > > National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST)
> > > > 100 Bureau Drive, Stop 8970
> > > > Gaithersburg, MD 20899-8970
> > > >
> > > > Voice: 301-975-3262
> > > > Fax:   301-590-9174
> > > > Email: skall@nist.gov
> > > > ****************************************************************
> > > >
> > > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > > From: Karl Dubost [mailto:karl@w3.org]
> > > > > Sent: Tuesday, June 14, 2005 3:05 PM
> > > > > To: Paul Grosso; Mark W. Skall
> > > > > Cc: qa-chairs@w3.org
> > > > > Subject: Re: Objection to resolution of LC comment [was:
> > > > Answer to Paul
> > > > > Grosso about Classes of Products]
> > > > >
> > > > > Hi Paul, Hi Mark,
> > > > >
> > > > > Le 05-06-14 ŗ 14:33, Paul Grosso a ťcrit :
> > > > > > Hi Karl,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Unfortunately, I have a regularly scheduled team
> > > > > > meeting (my "day" job) Monday at 11:00 ET which is
> > > > > > when, I gather, the QA WG meets.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I'm willing to try to express myself (hopefully better
> > > > > > than I've done to date) to someone on the phone if that
> > > > > > is your desire.
> > > > >
> > > > > Many thanks for your answer. :) Mark Skall (NIST) will
> > coordinate a
> > > > > phone call with you.
> > > > >
> > > > > Mark, will you be able to call Paul in the opportunities
> > > > given below?
> > > > >
> > > > > > Tomorrow (Wednesday) is full, but my time is fairly
> > > > > > unscheduled Thursday and Friday.  I'd prefer to make
> > > > > > an "appointment" so that I can avoid being knee deep
> > > > > > in code when the time comes, but almost any time
> > > > > > between 10:00 and 18:00 ET (I'm actually one hour
> > > > > > earlier than ET myself) should work if someone wants
> > > > > > to suggest a time.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > paul
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >> -----Original Message-----
> > > > > >> From: Karl Dubost [mailto:karl@w3.org]
> > > > > >> Sent: Monday, 13 June, 2005 14:25
> > > > > >> To: Paul Grosso
> > > > > >> Cc: qa-chairs@w3.org
> > > > > >> Subject: Re: Objection to resolution of LC comment [was:
> > > > > >> Answer to Paul Grosso about Classes of Products]
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> Dear Paul,
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> We have read carefully your answer [1], and we
> > discussed about it
> > > > > >> this morning on the QA WG call.
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> Because we really would like to have a full
> > understanding of your
> > > > > >> concerns, and because we want to try to explain what
> > we meant by
> > > > > >> class of products. The QA WG is proposing you to attend
> > > > the next QA
> > > > > >> WG Teleconference on Monday, June 20, where we could
> > discuss the
> > > > > >> issue again.
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> In case you would not be able to attend this
> > > > teleconference, someone
> > > > > >> of the QA WG has volunteered to have a private phone
> > > > call this week,
> > > > > >> before next monday, with you to discuss it and explain
> > > > our thoughts
> > > > > >> and get your feedback.
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> Would you be interested?
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> Best Regards
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> [1]
> > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-archive/2005Jun/0000
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> --
> > > > > >> Karl Dubost - http://www.w3.org/People/karl/
> > > > > >> W3C Conformance Manager
> > > > > >> *** Be Strict To Be Cool ***
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > Karl Dubost - http://www.w3.org/People/karl/
> > > > > W3C Conformance Manager
> > > > > *** Be Strict To Be Cool ***
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> >
> >
Received on Tuesday, 21 June 2005 00:09:40 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 + w3c-0.30 : Tuesday, 21 June 2005 00:09:41 GMT