Hehe, we will never be stopped to be surprised by the W3C documents. http://www.w3.org/TR/2005/NOTE-xlink10-ext-20050127/ A W3C Note, not mandatory then proposing an extension to XLink 1.0 and how it should be done in an XLink 1.1 :))) -- Karl Dubost - http://www.w3.org/People/karl/ W3C Conformance Manager *** Be Strict To Be Cool ***Received on Friday, 28 January 2005 15:57:18 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 + w3c-0.30 : Thursday, 9 June 2005 12:13:19 GMT