W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-qa-wg@w3.org > January 2005

Fwd: Review of ATAG 1 last call against SpecGL last call

From: Tim Boland <frederick.boland@nist.gov>
Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2005 14:18:04 -0500
Message-Id: <>
To: www-qa-wg@w3.org

fyi - I also started a review of ATAG2.0 LC WD myself but haven't finished 
it yet..

>X-Sieve: CMU Sieve 2.2
>Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2005 11:36:55 -0500 (EST)
>From: Charles McCathieNevile <charles@w3.org>
>To: www-qa@w3.org
>X-Original-To: www-qa@w3.org
>Subject: Review of ATAG 1 last call against SpecGL last call
>Resent-From: www-qa@w3.org
>X-Mailing-List: <www-qa@w3.org> archive/latest/1660
>X-Loop: www-qa@w3.org
>Sender: www-qa-request@w3.org
>Resent-Sender: www-qa-request@w3.org
>List-Id: <www-qa.w3.org>
>List-Help: <http://www.w3.org/Mail/>
>List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:www-qa-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>
>Resent-Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2005 16:36:56 +0000
>X-MailScanner-From: www-qa-request@w3.org
>Hi folks,
>I have looked at the Authoring Tool Accessibility Guidelines last call
>document, and done a review of how well it meets the last call draft of
>SpecGL. The summary is that they conform to all but one requirement, and
>noted in the draft that they expected to conform to this final requirement by
>the time the last call draft was published. They also implement many of the
>good practices.
>I will be sending the review to the group tomorrow because it is late
>already, but if anyone has time to look over it and wants to comment quickly
>it is at http://www.w3.org/2005/01/cmn-atag-review
>Charles McCathieNevile             http://www.w3.org/People/Charles
>tel: +61 409 134 136                 fax(france): +33 4 92 38 78 22
>Post:    21 Mitchell street, FOOTSCRAY Vic 3011, Australia    or
>  W3C, 2004 Route des Lucioles, 06902 Sophia Antipolis Cedex, France
Received on Monday, 10 January 2005 19:18:11 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:14:34 UTC