W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-qa-wg@w3.org > April 2005

[draft] answer to Dave Marston comment on Conformance section for a technology or for a specification (005)

From: Karl Dubost <karl@w3.org>
Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2005 10:40:36 -0400
Message-Id: <5cc523720f590dcaa21effa367410d1d@w3.org>
To: 'www-qa-wg@w3.org' <www-qa-wg@w3.org>

Original comment (issue 986 [1]):
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-qa-wg/2004Aug/0099.html


As a response to your comment, the QA Working Group has not accepted  
your comment. An additional decision of the QA WG has removed the  
"Umbrella Specification" topic from Specification Guidelines to move it  
to Variability in Specifications. One technique of Requirement 01  
addresses the notion of Conformance when the technology is divided in  
multiple documents.



[1] http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=986
[2]  
http://www.w3.org/TR/2005/WD-qaframe-spec-20050428/#include- 
conformance-clause-principle



-- 
Karl Dubost - http://www.w3.org/People/karl/
W3C Conformance Manager
*** Be Strict To Be Cool ***
Received on Friday, 29 April 2005 14:40:41 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 + w3c-0.30 : Thursday, 9 June 2005 12:13:20 GMT