W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-qa-wg@w3.org > April 2005

[draft] answer to TAG, Marston comment on Suggestions of examples for section 2.3

From: Karl Dubost <karl@w3.org>
Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2005 09:59:24 -0400
Message-Id: <2c817ba672b5522a4370443015f65143@w3.org>
To: 'www-qa-wg@w3.org' <www-qa-wg@w3.org>

Original comment (issue 1149 [1]):
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-qa/2005Mar/0004.html

As a response to your comment, the QA Working Group has accepted your 
comment and the following examples[2] have been added to SpecGL:

[[[
As a separate example, any specification that defines the behavior of a 
class of
product that creates XML should address creation of XML 1.1 and 
anticipate
future XML versions. In XSLT, creation of XML is specified by 
<xsl:output
method="xml" version="1.0" />, and each version of XSLT defines the 
allowable
range of values for the version attribute. Another option is to 
reference the
XML Infoset - for instance, XML Inclusions are compatible both with XML 
1.0 and
XML 1.1 since they reference normatively the XML Infoset, which is the 
same for
the two versions of XML.

In its section Referencing the Unicode Standard and ISO/IEC 10646, the
specification Character Model for the World Wide Web 1.0: Fundamentals 
[CHARMOD]
gives a detailed indications for referencing Unicode Standard and 
ISO/IEC 10646.
Specification editors are encouraged to follow these recommendations.
]]]

[1] http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=1149
[2] http://www.w3.org/TR/2005/WD-qaframe-spec-20050428/#ref-define-ex



-- 
Karl Dubost - http://www.w3.org/People/karl/
W3C Conformance Manager
*** Be Strict To Be Cool ***
Received on Friday, 29 April 2005 13:59:31 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 + w3c-0.30 : Thursday, 9 June 2005 12:13:20 GMT