W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-qa-wg@w3.org > April 2005

RE: SpecGL ICS for SpecGL

From: Dominique HazaŽl-Massieux <dom@w3.org>
Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2005 14:25:07 +0200
To: "Lynne S. Rosenthal" <lynne.rosenthal@nist.gov>
Cc: 'Karl Dubost' <karl@w3.org>, "'www-qa-wg@w3.org'" <www-qa-wg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <1114431908.6451.31.camel@stratustier>
Le lundi 25 avril 2005 ŗ 07:38 -0400, Lynne S. Rosenthal a ťcrit :
> Yes I agree, the way we wrote the requirements, they are in the form of test
> assertions. 

I think I would disagree on this; last time, going from the conformance
requirements to test assertions wasn't that trivial, and I think we're
in the same situation here (i.e. the imperatives are conformance
requirements, not test assertions).

Dom
-- 
Dominique HazaŽl-Massieux - http://www.w3.org/People/Dom/
W3C/ERCIM
mailto:dom@w3.org


Received on Monday, 25 April 2005 12:25:21 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 + w3c-0.30 : Thursday, 9 June 2005 12:13:20 GMT