[draft] answer to TAG comment on ICS needs more than y/n/n-a

Original comment (issue 1157 [1]):
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-qa/2005Mar/0013.html

As a response to your comment, the QA Working Group has accepted your 
comment and has added verbiage to new version of the ICS with
	- a comments column,
	- absolute links to the spec,
	- asking users to link back to the relevant spec parts. [2]:

	"The presentation is intended to be convenient 	for organizers and 
evaluators of QA projects in
	W3C Working Groups, to facilitate assessing
	specifications against the checkpoints. The table
	includes spaces for scoring each checkpoint, "yes"
	(satisfied), "no" (not satisfied), "n/a" (not
	applicable), and comments.

	Users of this ICS are encouraged to put links in
	the comments column back to the reviewed specification
	parts illustrating how it conforms to the Specification
	Guidelines."


[1] http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=1157
[2] http://www.w3.org/QA/Group/2005/02/qaframe-spec/specgl-ics

-- 
Karl Dubost - http://www.w3.org/People/karl/
W3C Conformance Manager
*** Be Strict To Be Cool ***