W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-qa-wg@w3.org > April 2005

[draft] Proposed answer to TAG comment on workflow

From: Karl Dubost <karl@w3.org>
Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2005 14:32:02 -0400
Message-Id: <421e9758ab71282b0053722e1004c937@w3.org>
To: 'www-qa-wg@w3.org' <www-qa-wg@w3.org>
Original comment (issue 1144 [1]):

As a response to your comment where it was pointed out that the 
specification was mixing workflow and specification editing, the QA 
Working Group has accepted your comment and decided to create a new 
section which is not mandatory : "Beyond Conformance."[2]
This section contains previous Good Practices which were workflow 
related and that a WG might want to explore during the specification 
editing. Some of the good practices have been rewritten as well to 
remove their workflow orientation when it was not necessary.

You might want to take a look at the table of changes[3] to not be lost.

[1] http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=1144
[2] http://www.w3.org/QA/Group/2005/02/qaframe-spec/#beyond-conformance
[3] http://www.w3.org/QA/2005/04/specgl-table.html

Karl Dubost - http://www.w3.org/People/karl/
W3C Conformance Manager
*** Be Strict To Be Cool ***

Received on Tuesday, 19 April 2005 19:21:12 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:14:34 UTC