W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-qa-wg@w3.org > September 2004

Re: QA WG review of Webarch doc?

From: karl Dubost <karl@w3.org>
Date: Mon, 13 Sep 2004 11:59:54 +0900
Message-Id: <FD1ED975-0530-11D9-9CBE-000A95718F82@w3.org>
To: 'www-qa-wg@w3.org' <www-qa-wg@w3.org>

Le 13 sept. 2004, ŗ 01:13, Lofton Henderson a ťcrit :
> I think that SpecLite has drifted a bit too far away from that 
> cautionary approach (more comments later), and WebArch is too far from 
> that approach.  As I interpret, Karl is saying similar in his 
> comments...

Just to be clear :) And because I'm from Normandy: YES and NO ;)

* Yes, I think that Web Arch document is too far lousy.
* No, I don't think SpecLite has drifted too far away.

My point is that SpecGL offers a good compromise between the very 
strict nature of QA Frame Spec GL CR and the too smooth nature of Web 
Arch.

For Web Arch doc, I would definitely encourage them to
	1. point on QA Spec GL and Variability in Specifications.
  	2. to remove bits on proved experience indeed as Lofton said or to 
give a bit more examples. It's not enough balanced.



-- 
Karl Dubost - http://www.w3.org/People/karl/
W3C Conformance Manager
*** Be Strict To Be Cool ***

Received on Monday, 13 September 2004 02:59:59 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 + w3c-0.30 : Thursday, 9 June 2005 12:13:18 GMT