W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-qa-wg@w3.org > October 2004

[closed]: too positive on extensibility [was: random comments on 2nd LC of WebArch]

From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2004 10:24:26 -0500
To: Dominique HazaŽl-Massieux <dom@w3.org>
Cc: Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org>, www-qa-wg@w3.org, public-webarch-comments@w3.org
Message-Id: <1098890666.14529.2243.camel@dirk>
On Wed, 2004-10-27 at 10:10, Dominique HazaŽl-Massieux wrote:
> Le mar 05/10/2004 ŗ 15:14, Chris Lilley a ťcrit :
> > please see the new introductory text at
> > http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2004/webarch-20040928/Overview.html#ext-version
> >
> > Later on we more clearly differentiate between extensibility and
> > versioning, as agreed at the TAG/QA joint telcon.
> > 
> > We believe this addresses your concern; do you agree?
> 
> The QA WG discussed this during its F2F meeting today and agreed this
> addresses our concerns. Sorry for the delay in our answer.

Actually, this is still quite timely. Thanks.

I presume I can close the more official QA WG thread too...
http://www.w3.org/mid/1095351501.2955.11.camel@stratustier

> 
> Dom
-- 
Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541  0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E

Received on Wednesday, 27 October 2004 15:24:23 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 + w3c-0.30 : Thursday, 9 June 2005 12:13:18 GMT